Newsletter: January 2010

28 December 2009 | Newsletters
Embrace! at the Denver Art Museum
Nicole in front of the Denver Art Museum on Christmas Eve
Nicole in front of the Denver Art Museum on Christmas Eve

On my way to Santa Fe I had a brief stop in Denver which led me to their art museum–a first visit for me. In 2001, the DAM commissioned architect Daniel Libeskind to design an expansion that would accommodate the growing collections and programs. The 146,000-square-foot Frederic C. Hamilton Building opened to the public in October 2006. It has caused controversy since it first opened; the contemporary design is appealing aesthetically, but a nightmare to display art in with its sloping walls and odd shaped spaces. This year, 17 artists from around the world were invited to create works in the space to open a dialogue between the architecture and the art and see how they could influence and impact one another.

Nicola Lopez

Nicola Lopez

Highlights from the show were Nicola Lopez’s work made from cut paper pinned to the gallery walls reminiscent of highways;

Shinique Smith

Shinique Smith

Shinique Smith’s installation in blue in which she used body parts to paint the walls al la Yves Klein and collected found objects to create a three-dimensional element to her work;

Charles Sandison

Charles Sandison

Charles Sandison’s chamber video installation in which he created a primitive space filled with digitally projected ever changing lines, letters and numbers. He compared it to a fireplace in which you can lose yourself in looking at the flame–here you lose yourself in the visuals of technology;

Lawrence Weiner

Lawrence Weiner

Lawrence Weiner’s word work where language itself becomes the art;

John McEnroe

John McEnroe

John McEnroe’s Ernesto Neto-like organic shapes dangling from the ceiling;

Jessica Stockholder

Jessica Stockholder

Jessica Stockholder’s investigation of color and its varieties of saturation;

Katharina Grosse

Katharina Grosse

and Katarina Grosse’s spraypainted entryway.

Bauhaus 1919-1933: Workshops for Modernity

The Bauhaus at MoMA

The Bauhaus at MoMA

This exhibition at MoMA thoroughly examines the most influential school of avant-garde art, design and architecture of the 20th century. Literally meaning “house of building” the Bauhaus, a term coined by the school’s founder Walter Gropius, was created to offer an interdisciplinary approach to the arts. All arts had equal status at the school when it was first founded in 1919. It had three different locations throughout its 14 year history: Weimar, Dessau, and Berlin, Germany and three different directors: Walter Gropius, Hannes Meyer, and Mies van der Rohe. It “generated productive conversation among faculty and students on the nature of modernity and the modern art object.”

Gropius selected faculty straight from the avant-garde including Feininger, Klee, Kandinsky, Moholy- Nagy, etc. He founded his manifesto on a medieval cathedral which is the great holder for society because it brings all of the arts and crafts together for the public to view and experience. The most important principle for the students in the first years of its creation was to be schooled in abstract language including color and form before moving on to specific areas of interest; work of previous artists should not be imitated but materials should be played with and experimented with. This show includes 420 works with architecture as the unifying force (though the architecture workshop was not set up until 1929). Curator Berry Bergdoll wants the viewers to understand that the Bauhaus is not a style or movement, but a school. What was once labeled as “degenerative art” is now shown as exemplary in the canons of art history.

Klee

Klee, Contrasts in the Evening, 1924

What I found most interesting was how the work of the teachers was markedly influenced by their teaching experience. For example, Paul Klee’s color-theory exercises influenced works like “Contrasts in the Evening” from 1924. In it horizontal bands of color mediate the complementary colors orange and blue.

Kurt Schmidt

Kurt Schmidt, Form and Color Organ with Moving Color, 1923

One of my favorite works in the show is Kurt Schmidt’s “Form and Color Organ with Moving Color Tones” from 1923. It is a painted wooden relief sculpture with colored strips arranged horizontally and vertically on a multi-colored grid. As the viewer moves back and forth, the palette of warm red and brown transforms into cool blues and greens; there is an interactive element to the abstraction in this work that I found intriguing for the time it was created.

Moholy-Nagy, Photogram, 1926

Moholy-Nagy, Photogram, 1926

Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, an artist with strong ties to Constructivism,  joined the faculty in 1923. Many of his works are on view including those which garnered an interest in photography and film. The first darkrooms were set up in 1927 and became part of the curriculum. Some of his photograms are on view where he would expose photo paper to light while placing an object on it, not a traditional photo at all but more an exploration of what the medium of photography can do. His influences are linked to what we most often associate with the Bauhaus.

In April 1925 the Bauhaus moved to the booming town of Dessau and former students such as Albers and Breuer became faculty. The building became the center of school life. The building is one of the first to have no real facade. Different rooms in the masters’ houses had different brightly colored walls which are recreated in this show. In 1928 Gropius left the Bauhaus and with him went many distinguished faculty. Hannes Meyer was hired to run the architecture department and became the director within a year.  By 1932 Mies van der Rohe arranged for the school to move to Berlin and he reduced the staff and program. The school closed because the Nazis had taken over.

Oskar Schlemmer, Bauhaus Stairway, 1932

Oskar Schlemmer, Bauhaus Stairway, 1932

In 1932, 3 days after the school was closed, Oskar Schlemmer painted Bauhaus Stairway as a memorial to the school and all that it had stood for. This work is owned by MoMA.

"African" Chair-collaboration between female and male student

"African" Chair-collaboration between female and male student

What I found refreshing but also a bit overwhelming about this show are the varied objects on view. Lamps, paintings, furniture, performance work, puppets, ceramics, textiles, printed fabrics can all be seen as they represented all aspects of the Bauhaus curriculum. But it became too much to take in after awhile (perhaps that is because I saw this exhibit right after visiting the Kandinsky show at the Guggenheim). Also, I felt that there was too much repetitive wall text in the show. While the viewer needs some background information, he/she learns very quickly that Klee and Kandinsky taught with an emphasis on form and color, one doesn’t need to read it over and over.

For a solid introduction to the Bauhaus and all that it stood for, this show is worth a visit. Just be sure that it is your only art experience for the day or you may have information overload. I enjoyed my second, curator-led tour very much as it was pointed and I was therefore unable to get lost in the objects.

Looking In: Robert Frank’s “The Americans”

Charity Ball, 1954

Charity Ball, 1954

Honestly, I knew very little about this artist or the book the exhibition is centered on before my visit. I had heard the name before but never connected the work with the artist. This exhibition, with all 83 photos from the book on view in sequential order, is small and managebale, has a tremendous impact on the viewer and is worth a trip to the Met. What struck me is that even though these images were taken over 50 years ago, many of them could be taken today. The issues that Frank brought up that highlight some of the faults of our country are still issues that we need to address such as classism and racism. For example the image Charity Ball from 1954 could have been taken last weekend at a holiday party in Manhattan. There are still those who think they are better than others because they have money or are educated. But this exhibition points out to us that we are all human and we are all Americans searching for a good life and happiness.

Original edition and cover, The Americans

Original edition and cover, The Americans

In 1958 Frank’s book entitled The Americans was first published in France. The following year it would make its debut in the States. At first it was received with hostility as it forced viewers to see the nation as it really was, still segregated by race, economic and social standing. However, other photographers immediately recognized the book’s impact on changing the course of 20th century photography. He “looked beneath the surface of American life to reveal a people plagued by racism, ill-served by politicians, and rendered numb by the ever expanding consumer culture.” But at the same time, he managed to find beauty in the overlooked areas of our nation. Frank took innovative shots of roads, diners, people, and cars linking shots thematically in his book.

Parade-Hoboken, New Jersey, 1955

Parade-Hoboken, New Jersey, 1955

Born in 1924 in Switzerland he began taking photographs in 1941. In February of 1947 he immigrated to the United States. Hired to shoot fashion shots for Harper’s Bazaar, he quit soon after he began. Frank traveled for four years selecting one thing to photograph in each city he visited: hats in Peru, chairs and flowers in Paris, and banker in London. In 1955 he was awarded the Guggenheim Fellowship, bought a used Ford and headed on a 10,000 mile journey across the nation in an attempt to get a sense of the people of America. He developed 767 rolls of film after this journey which would later become the basis of the book.

Street Car, New Orleans, 1955

Trolley, New Orleans, 1955

The Americans is divided into four sections, each beginning with a photograph of a flag and exploring a different aspect of the American culture. Section one investigates people, section two takes a look at inequality, section three examines religion, work, media, and politics, and the fourth section implies that US politics drown out the voices of average citizens and that Americans worship false icons such as celebrities and cowboys. Each image appears spontaneous and fleeting due to dynamic compositions, often with exposures that seem too light or too dark; this was something not previously done before. This project allowed Frank the freedom to only attempt to please himself in the photographs he took as opposed to his previous jobs pleasing magazine editors. He was able to find something remarkable in the mundane, the banal. The last image of the book is a shot of his wife and son in the car. “By standing outside the car and looking in, he acknowledged his need to separate himself from his family in order to create his art and the price they had to pay for his choice.” Shortly after the book’s publication, Frank abandoned photography for filmmaking.

Kandinsky at the Guggenheim

Several Circles, 1926

Several Circles, 1926

Vasily Kandinsky was born in Moscow in 1866 and died in France in 1944. Having broken new ground in painting at the beginning of the 20th century, the Guggenheim is holding the first retrospective of his work since 1985. In 1929 Solomon Guggenheim, under the advice of Hilla Rebay, purchased Kandinsky in depth, and in 1939 he opened the Museum of Non-Objective Art to display his collection. It was not until 1943 that Frank Lloyd Wright designed the current space which was built to house works like those of Kandinsky which are the “core” of the Guggenheim collection. Having personally never been blown away by the Guggenheim as a viewing space for large exhibitions, it was refreshing to see works on display that the building was actually created for. Included in the exhibition are around 100 paintings and 60 works on paper. Kandinsky lived through two World Wars and the 1917 Russian Revolution; there is no doubt that  his desire to create work that advocated the spiritual experience of life is born out of the environment and time in which he lived.

As a child Kandinsky was exposed to music and art. He studied law and economics but influenced by a viewing of Impressionist work (in particular Monet’s Haystack) at an exhibition in 1895, he left Moscow to study painting in Munich. At a Wagner concert in 1896, he noticed that music can elicit emotions despite its lack of a connection to a recognizable subject. He strove to create a similar experience for viewers of his work.

Landscape near Murnau with Locomotive, 1909

Landscape near Murnau with Locomotive, 1909

His early works evoke the Russia of his childhood and landscapes of places he visited during his many travels. He spent a year in Paris and his brushwork was clearly influenced by the Post-Impressionists and Fauves. In 1908 he returned to Munich and began a period of intense activity. He was a leading force in the avant-garde painting scene. He began to use more bold color and there was a growing trend of abstraction in his work. In 1912 he published Der Blaue Reiter with Franz Marc which contained images and articles united in the common idea of the expressionist potential of color. By 1910 much of his output included depictions of cataclysmic events…”his dream of a better, more spiritual future was achieved through the transformative powers of art.” It was during this time that the horse and rider theme also became prevalent which also represented his path toward salvation. As his work became more abstract, colors no longer corresponded to actual objects: blue trees, purple faces, green horses. This section included my favorite period of his work which is quite aesthetically pleasing.

Accent in Pink, 1926

Accent in Pink, 1926

In 1911 Kandinsky began a correspondence with a Viennese composer named Arnold Schonberg who was experimenting with music in a similar manner that Kandinsky was experimenting with painting. It was during this time that Kandinsky published his famous treatise “On the Spiritual in Art” which “examines the capacity of color to communicate the artist’s innermost psychological concerns.” It was during this period that Kandinsky’s style moved toward complete abstraction. Color, shape, and line became his primary focus. In 1914, due to World War I Kandinsky was forced to leave Germany and his creative period came to a screeching halt. It was not until 1916 that he returned to oil painting. He titled works similarly to musical scores: Improvisation, Composition, etc. One can begin to see how music is in his mind when he creates the work, shapes and line dance across the canvas in bright colors. In the 1920s Kandinsky’s work becomes darker with a more subdued palette. From 1922-1933 he lived and taught at the Bauhaus and the art he created during these years is characterized by a geometric style. He used circles (a form most closely linked to the cosmos), squares (representative of peace and calm), and triangles (symbolizing aggression) along with straight lines and grids. Kandinsky found the Bauhaus environment supportive of his belief in art to “transform self and society.” There are some lovely works in this section where what at first appears to be a monochromatic background upon further inspection turns out to be layers of shades of one color.

Accompanied Contrast, 1935

Accompanied Contrast, 1935

After moving to Paris in 1933, his Surrealist peers Arp, Miro, Ernst, and Klee began to inspire his work. He invented his own language of biomorphic forms and his palette shifted to soft pastels “applied with a lightness of touch.” It was during this time that he began to experiment with different materials, often combining sand with pigment. Not necessarily my taste, I appreciated these later works more on my second visit to the show. During World War II Kandinsky’s work was labeled “degenerate.” His productivity dwindled and in 1944, he died.

Succession, 1935

Succession, 1935

Gabriel Orozco at MoMA

Mr. Orozco at the opening

Mr. Orozco at the opening

I have been eagerly awaiting this show ever since my encounter with the artist on my trip to Mexico City. Due to the Swine Flu outbreak, I was unable to see his exhibition opening at Kurimanzutto the following day. So, off I headed on opening night to the 2nd and 6th floors of my home away from home…the Museum of Modern Art.

Invariants

Samurai Tree Invariants

I began on the 2nd floor where the room usually housing prints is filled with Orozco’s “Samurai Tree Invariants.” These are digital prints with “vibrant geometric abstractions previously realized as paintings, drawings, and photocollages.” Consisting of circles on a square background in a restricted palette of blue, red, white, and yellow, he utilizes his common motif, the circle almost as a means of meditation in its creation. 460 permutations are on view in the show.

Born in 1962 in Jalapa, Mexico, Orozco became recognized by the art world  in his early 30s by transforming ordinary objects into works of art to be pondered. In 1993, MoMA asked him to participate in their “Projects Series” which resulted in his first solo show. This current mid-career retrospective highlights two decades of sculpture, drawings, photographs, and paintings. He has worked and loved in Mexico, New York, Paris, and traveled all over the world often creating site-specific works. As the wall text points out, this is the first time that many of these works are in dialogue with each other.

Whale

Mobile Matrix in the atrium

On view in the atrium is “Mobile Matrix” from 2006, a sculpture made from a whale skeleton found on the beach in Baja, California. Orozco has described himself as, “a consumer of anything at hand and a producer of what already exists.”

La DS

La DS

Hanging four yogurt lids on each wall of a white gallery space, taking the middle section out of a car (”La DS”),

Four Bicycles

Four Bicycles

or melding bikes together (”Four Bicycles: There Is Always One Direction”) he manipulates objects for reinterpretation. His photos of a mark of breath on a piano lid and an “island within an island” (Jersey walls put together to create an island on the island of Manhattan) demonstrate his humor and wit.

Shoes

Shoes

Shoes and shoelaces melded together into one object, fired clay body parts, an incised soccer ball all are on display.

Eyes in elephant

Eyes Under Elephant Foot

Detail

Detail

“Eyes Under Elephant Foot” consists of a beaucarnea tree trunk and glass eyes which eerily peek out at the viewer.

Working Table

Working Table

However, my favorite of the works on view is the “working table” in the back gallery. As he has created works in a variety of places, Orozco has not maintained a studio of his own anywhere so his apartment functions as a storage facility with works on shelves, in shoeboxes, etc.

Detail of working table

Detail of a Working Table

Since 1996, these “working tables” have been exhibited as works of art which allow the viewer to get an intimate look into the process behind the creation of his art. Included are studies and maquettes for finished works, the beginnings of works that were never realized and found objects.

While I enjoy Orozco’s work immensely, I found this exhibition a bit conservative and staid.  His work usually packs a punch and it lacks some of that power when presented in this way. I am still a fan though and look forward to seeing more of his work in the future, just not all jammed into a multitude of white cubes.

Watteau to Degas: French drawings from the Frits Lugt Collection

Jean-Étienne Liotard, (1702–1789) Frankish Woman from Galata and Her Servant, c. 1740–42 Black and red chalk on two sheets of paper, joined vertically 20.4 x 25.0 cm Fondation Custodia, Paris

Jean-Étienne Liotard, (1702–1789) Frankish Woman from Galata and Her Servant, c. 1740–42 Black and red chalk on two sheets of paper, 20.4 x 25.0 cm Courtesy of Fondation Custodia, Paris

On view at the Frick until January 10th, this is a little jewel of an exhibition. With only 64 small and detailed drawings on view it is easy to manage in an hour. Lugt was a Dutch art historian and collector. On view are some of the most exquisite gems from the 18th and 19th centuries as well as a few 20th century works acquired after Lugt’s death. Works by Watteau, Fragonard, David, Ingres, Millet, Degas, etc. are displayed and the museum even provides magnifying glasses to viewers so that you won’t miss the gorgeous detail in this small drawings, gouaches, and watercolors.

Pierre-Paul Prud’hon, The Cellist, 1777-1778,Pen and black ink, gray wash over graphite 28.2 x 43.6 cm Fondation Custodia, Paris

Pierre-Paul Prud'hon, The Cellist, 1777-1778, Pen and black ink, gray wash over graphite 28.2 x 43.6 cm courtesy of Fondation Custodia, Paris


Comments are closed.